{"id":2176,"date":"2021-06-07T09:09:00","date_gmt":"2021-06-07T07:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.klicarquitectos.com\/villa-romana-cortijo-robledo\/"},"modified":"2026-09-06T11:26:41","modified_gmt":"2026-09-06T09:26:41","slug":"villa-romana-cortijo-robledo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.klicarquitectos.com\/en\/blog\/villa-romana-cortijo-robledo\/","title":{"rendered":"Villa Romana de Cortijo Robledo \u00b7 Outdoor museum design for a 5th-century AD archaeological site in Antequera (M\u00e1laga)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Two steel canopies cut out against the mountains, two colours of gravel and a red aggregate path: that is all you see, and that was the idea. Archaeological monitoring of a motorway scheme turned up a Roman villa on the very hill the new alignment was due to cross. Andalusia\u2019s regional culture department would not allow it to be destroyed, so the remains were lifted, moved 2,340 metres south and rebuilt on an artificial mound shaped to the topography of the original hill. Our commission was the final phase, the one that decides whether any of that effort is ever seen: an outdoor museum design for an archaeological site in Antequera (M\u00e1laga).<\/p>\n

The commission: the villa had already moved before we arrived<\/h2>\n

Worth saying up front: we did not move it. By the time we drew up the project, the artificial mound, its drainage and the re-erection of the remains had already been carried out by others. Before any of that, the site and its setting were recorded with a 3D laser scan, using the same sweep technology employed in underwater archaeology, applied here on dry land. That model is what allowed a new mound to be built with the topography of the original hill, and the remains to be set back on it, in large part stone by stone.<\/p>\n

The paperwork explains why the move was an obligation rather than a design idea. The regional culture department (Delegaci\u00f3n Provincial de Cultura<\/em>) issued protection measures, reported favourably and authorised the extraction, transport, relocation and re-erection. The villa is listed as site no. 256 in Antequera\u2019s local plan (PGOU<\/em>). Spanish heritage consent, incidentally, runs on a separate track from municipal planning permission: the authorisation was granted expressly without prejudice to the town hall\u2019s own remit.<\/p>\n

We came in for the final phase, working alongside archaeologists, historians and a graphic design and communications team. Two premises, neither of them aesthetic: respect for the surviving remains, and public access. Everything else followed from those.<\/p>\n

Outdoor museum design for a site you are not allowed to touch<\/h2>\n

The relocation area covers 3,373.55 m\u00b2. We worked on 2,141.00 m\u00b2 of it: 1,109.15 m\u00b2 of archaeological remains and 1,031.85 m\u00b2 of paths. The route is a double perimeter loop, tangent to both archaeological areas, with crossing circulation, and it does not step on the remains at any point. The paths are 13\/40 mm screened red crushed aggregate, laid 100 mm deep over ground compacted to 90 % Proctor. Ordinary road-building material: simple, permeable and liftable with a shovel.<\/p>\n

The villa had two halves: the pars rustica<\/em>, where olive oil was produced, and the pars urbana<\/em>, where people lived. We could have explained that with another sign. We explained it with the ground instead. The voids between the remains were filled with gravel in two colours, white and grey, so that the two zones read without anyone having to look at a panel. The panels, the lecterns in weathering steel and the marker at the entrance, stamped with the villa\u2019s name, carry the written information.<\/p>\n

Only two spots are covered, the two that will not survive being rained on: the oil storage vat in the production zone and the hypocaust in the residential one. That is 138.41 m\u00b2 of canopy over 2,141 m\u00b2 of works; everything else stays open to the sky. Both pergolas are polygonal on plan, with columns of varying height generating triangular enveloping planes. Abstract shapes, with nothing pastiche-Roman about them, set to read against the mountain ranges that surround the mound. S275 steel, 175.5 mm circular columns, IPE beams and isolated concrete pad footings in HA-25: the ground investigation returned an allowable bearing pressure of 0.1 N\/mm\u00b2, which is low, and the foundations were sized for it.<\/p>\n

On site: a column landing on a Roman floor<\/h2>\n

Then the drawings met the ground. One of the columns of the hypocaust pergola clashed with an archaeological floor. Shifting it by a few centimetres was not an option, so the geometry of both canopies changed: the hypocaust canopy grew from 67 to 86 m\u00b2, and the vat canopy shrank from 85 to 53 m\u00b2 and went from six sides to five. That meant recalculating foundations and structure to the final geometry, with IPE-220 and IPE-180 main beams, IPE-120 edge beams and IPE-100 purlins.<\/p>\n

Not everything was built as drawn, and it is fair to say so. At the client\u2019s instruction, the weathering steel of the pergolas and benches was replaced by steel with a weathering-steel-effect paint finish; the treated timber fence by a stepped white event-type fence; the handrail by precast concrete kerbs; and the cut-and-fill sections with timber-sleeper steps were dropped. The practical completion certificate (certificado final de obra<\/em>) was signed on 6 April 2013.<\/p>\n

What it amounts to<\/h2>\n

We looked for precedents before starting and found no case in Spain of an entire Roman villa being moved. The nearest we could find were the Temple of Debod in Madrid and the Corominas site in Estepona, and neither poses quite the same problem.<\/p>\n

The villa was made visitable in 2013, on a mound that did not exist, 2,340 metres from where it was built. What you actually see is two steel canopies, two colours of gravel and a red aggregate path. The architecture here earned its keep by how little of it there is. If you are dealing with heritage or an archaeological site in M\u00e1laga, contact our architecture studio in M\u00e1laga<\/a> and we will take a look.<\/p>\n

Gallery<\/h2>\n
\"Protective<\/figure>\n
\"Interpretive<\/figure>\n
\"Detail<\/figure>\n
\"Protective<\/figure>\n
\"Interpretive<\/figure>\n
\"Site<\/figure>\n
\"Longitudinal<\/figure>\n
\"Overall<\/figure>\n

Project data<\/h2>\n
    \n
  • Typology:<\/strong> Heritage \u00b7 outdoor museum design for a relocated archaeological site<\/li>\n
  • Site chronology:<\/strong> 5th century AD (Late Roman Empire \/ Late Antiquity)<\/li>\n
  • Use:<\/strong> Cultural (visitable archaeological site)<\/li>\n
  • Location:<\/strong> Cortijo Robledo, Antequera (M\u00e1laga, Spain)<\/li>\n
  • Design year:<\/strong> 2010-2011<\/li>\n
  • Construction year:<\/strong> 2013<\/li>\n
  • Status:<\/strong> Completed<\/li>\n
  • Built area:<\/strong> 138.41 m\u00b2 of canopy (two steel pergolas)<\/li>\n
  • Plot area:<\/strong> 3,373.55 m\u00b2 relocation area, with 2,141.00 m\u00b2 within the scope of works<\/li>\n
  • Units:<\/strong> 2 steel protective canopies<\/li>\n
  • Programme:<\/strong> Lightweight protective canopies, accessible interpretive route, interpretive panels (pars urbana and pars r\u00fastica), site plan and documentary axonometric<\/li>\n
  • Strategy:<\/strong> Reversibility, low impact and minimal contact with the archaeological stratigraphy<\/li>\n
  • Client:<\/strong> Public administration (national road works), commissioned through a private archaeology firm<\/li>\n
  • Main contractor:<\/strong> Sacyr Vallehermoso, S.A.<\/li>\n
  • Architecture:<\/strong> Klic Arquitectos \u00b7 M\u00e1laga<\/li>\n
  • Site direction (direcci\u00f3n de obra):<\/strong> Juan Go\u00f1i Uriarte and Ruth Buj\u00e1n Varela \u00b7 Klic Arquitectos<\/li>\n
  • Works supervision (direcci\u00f3n de ejecuci\u00f3n):<\/strong> Antonio Ram\u00edrez Escalona, technical architect<\/li>\n
  • Structural engineering:<\/strong> Jorge Barrios Corpa<\/li>\n
  • Graphic design and interpretation:<\/strong> Doctor Watson Comunicaci\u00f3n<\/li>\n
  • Photography:<\/strong> Juan Diego Jim\u00e9nez<\/li>\n
  • Architects’ Association stamp (visado):<\/strong> COA M\u00e1laga, 20 February 2012 (file 2012\/000442\/001)<\/li>\n
  • Klic services:<\/strong> Concept and technical design, and site direction<\/li>\n
  • Team:<\/strong> Juan Go\u00f1i Uriarte, Ruth Buj\u00e1n Varela, Alejandro Castillo, Myung Il Cano and Sun Il Cano<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Other projects in Antequera<\/h2>\n

    Discover our architectural keys to building or renovating a home in Antequera (M\u00e1laga)<\/a> and our contemporary single-family homes Plot 200<\/a>, Plot 54<\/a>, Plot 12<\/a> and Plot 90<\/a>, all in Antequera.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n